Wightlink responds after questions about finances

By Ross Findon

Thursday, January 10, 2013

 

FERRY company Wightlink has responded following questions about its finances from Isle of Wight MP Andrew Turner.

But Mr Turner said their response failed to address points raised about the company's finances.

In a statement issued today (Thursday) the company said: "Wightlink has recently revised its timetables to match more closely with customer demand.  

"In response to very low passenger numbers, a small number of overnight sailings no longer operate.

"Despite an extensive marketing effort to increase passenger numbers, the night sailings were poorly used.

"The affected sailings operated at very low capacity (on average, 93% empty for passengers and vehicle decks 80% empty) with staff often outnumbering passengers.

"Like many local businesses, Wightlink has been impacted by the challenging economic climate.  

"Falling tourism and higher fuel costs are some of the factors that are impacting our business.

"The timetable changes were made to secure the long term future of Wightlink for the benefit of all Islanders and customers.

"The provision of ferry services has recently been commented on by the Department of Transport.

"They point out that with three providers of cross Solent services with 230 daily crossings, there is an adequate ferry provision, even if a small number of services at unsocial hours have been curtailed.

"The owner of Wightlink, Macquarie European Infrastructure Fund 1(MEIF1), has remained committed to our company despite difficult economic conditions.  

"It has demonstrated this commitment with capital investment of more than £50 million for new ships and shore infrastructure. 

"Furthermore, no profits or cash have been taken out of the business during its current ownership.

"Both Wightlink and MEIF1 abide by all applicable tax laws."

But Mr Turner, who questioned the company's tax arrangements said: "The statement is interesting, but does not appear to answer any of my questions or address the 17 per cent inter-company loan interest rate issue.

"Hopefully we will get more clarity from McQuarie chief executive Nicholas Moore who I am writing to."

Comments

Log-in or register to comment on this story. See our House Rules here.

By ticking "Remember me" you agree to a cookie being stored on your computer - no personal data is shared.

Forgotten your password?
Displaying the last 10 of 11 comments - Show All Comments

Log-in to Report

by Mike Crowe

11th January 2013, at 09:27:52

I think the expession is "Asset Stripping"

Where are the owners of Wightlink? Who are they, there to help us or there to make money?

Log-in to Report

by Mike Crowe

11th January 2013, at 09:25:40

Arran, try a few more permutations. You are on the right track once the bridge is built. As you say, "Think real Estate". That ticket office at Fishbone will make a nice little waterside house won't it? And the rest of the site is now clear out in the middle ............. and as for the new neighbours at Gunwharf .................. :-) Now what would they rather see and have as neighbours .......?

Log-in to Report

by Arran Stratton

11th January 2013, at 08:50:43

If Wightlink are blaiming falling tourism as why they are cutting services, why aren't Red Funnel (excuse the pun) in the same boat? I think I can hear the death knell ringing for Wightlink. Maybe its time to sell of part of the service to another ferry or transport company. Hell Southwest trains would be useful running the Cat service, at least you'f have a fighting chance of the Cat meeting the trains. Mind you that sounds like an old idea i once saw in a history book...railways running a intergrated transport network hmmmm? Another idea would be to sell of real estate, sell Ryde pier and allow a route to southapton to open up. Mind you maybe just allow Solent & Wightline run the cat service, they seem to do it moe than Wightlink do anyway. There must be another Ferry company who would want to buy what is and could be very profitable route be it the Cat or Vehicle ferry. Also be really useful and sell the Gunwhaf termainal and move up to the Continental docks for a M275 link.

Log-in to Report

by Jay James

10th January 2013, at 22:13:26

Perhaps if they were make their return fares the same no matter how many days you are away, instead of charging more for the more days you stay away. After all, you're only travelling from A to B then back from B to A, it's not rocket science.

Log-in to Report

by Pete Martin

10th January 2013, at 20:34:42

Lower the prices and then see how busy it gets!!!!

Log-in to Report

by Mark Sanger

10th January 2013, at 20:07:47

Take their lience away temparly untill they re instate the night ferries.
Or carve up Wightlink altogether maybe the Islanders should just force a takeover bid themslevs.
Either way I think it's the end of the road for them come on folks meaning IWCC take over one of the routes outright (Lymington to Yarmouth prefably).
They should not be allowed to get away with it.

Log-in to Report

by Warren Copland

10th January 2013, at 19:39:57

This rubbish about staff outweighing passengers I do not believe. I have been on the 0100 ferry from Gunwharf hundreds of times and it takes 10 minutes just to get a coffee from the shop.

I often have to do a daily commute to London and when the trains are coming back down South, 70 percent of passengers get off at Winchester. Would South West Trains start and end all trains at Winchester as they are only 30 percent full by the time they arrive or depart? Of course they wouldn't.

At the end of the day we pay enough for there to be a regular service which we all expect. A letter just isn't enough.

Log-in to Report

by Den Young

10th January 2013, at 19:20:02

yippee Andrew Turner is going to write a letter, waste of time nothing will change this is Wightlink we are talking about, blinkered up and ripping us off

Log-in to Report

by Mr Justice

10th January 2013, at 18:25:13

A local business? Don't make us laugh. Local to where, Sydney or Melbourne?

As for 'not taking any money out of the business' I wonder would this dancing on the head of a pin answer sit well with Starbucks and its tax affairs? Mr Turner has rattled Wightlink, he must keep at it.

Log-in to Report

by Jake Gully

10th January 2013, at 18:12:04

They would of course have no difficulty finding investors offering 17%, probably they could easilly achieve 6-8% from UK investors.

Any views or opinions presented in the comments above are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the Isle of Wight County Press.