A former mayor has accused Hertsmere Borough Council of having no regard for the environment.

Timothy Gilligan, who has lived in Mimms Lane, Shenley, for 27 years, said its decision to allow tree surgeons Gristwood and Toms to use Green Belt land for business, proved it does not care about green issues.

Against planning officers recommendations, councillors have granted retrospective planning permission for the company in Harris Lane, Shenley, to keep using the patch of land to chop up and dispose of tree waste.

It is also used for nursery purposes and is due to be extended nearer to Mimms Lane.

Mr Gilligan, who was himself a councillor for eight years and mayor for one, said: "I have protested about this for a long time and I am sick of it. But now I don't know what to do.

"The decision demonstrates the council does not care about the Green Belt and that is very disappointing.

"What is likely to happen is that rubbish will pile up and spread.

"They are vandalising the area and I am annoyed that the advice of the planning officers was ignored."

The council defended its decision, however, and believes the accusations are unfounded.

Councillor Martin Heywood said: "It is totally untrue that the council does not care about the environment. We think the dual use of the land is completely acceptable, and taking into account the employment the company provides, we are in total support of them continuing to use it.

"It is a business which cannot be seen from the road. They have agreed to make any changes to ensure there is minimal noise, and waste production will be controlled. Really, this is much better use of Green Belt land than I have seen elsewhere."

Gristwood and Toms partner Andy Toms said: "I can understand Mr Gilligan's concern, but to be honest, we do so much for the community that I think the council can see that and realise that we need to be here." The decision must be approved by the Governement before it can be finalised.

Converted for the new archive on 30 June 2000.Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.