Biggest solar scheme approved

By Richard Wright

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

 

THE Isle of Wight’s biggest solar park has been approved.

Despite 23 letters of objection, the authority’s planning committee approved the 75-acre development at Hill Farm off Carpenters Road, between Brading and St Helens.

The photovoltaic park will have 131 rows of panels supplying enough electricity for 2,500 homes — an annual carbon saving, said developer BNRG Renewables, of 5,000 tonnes a year.

Most objections centred on the adverse effect on the countryside and the sensitive grassland habitat for nesting birds including skylarks, lapwings and meadow pipits.

St Helens Parish Council was among objectors but Brading Town Council supported the application, seeking a woodland buffer zone.

The Isle of Wight Council approval is subject to the panels being removed after 25 years, monitoring of bird collisions with the solar panels, and landscaping conditions.

Comments

Log-in or register to comment on this story.

By ticking "Remember me" you agree to a cookie being stored on your computer - no personal data is shared.

Forgotten your password?

Log-in to Report

by Yvonne Carter

24th January 2013, at 14:36:00

I undertand that plants can grow under the solar panels and in some places sheep can graze under them. If this is correct then the land would not be wasted. Depends on the height of the panels.

To the previous question - it snowed in Newport last winter - I'l'll find the dates for you if you really need to know when.

Log-in to Report

by James McAdder

24th January 2013, at 12:48:23

Its rather ironic that this gets the go ahead, while wind turbines get turned down. PV farms have a much greater impact on the environment than wind turbines because, by their very nature, they cover the land they are built on such that nothing can grow beneath them.

Whether you are for or against either PV or wind power, the lack of real opposition to this development suggests that the real concern of the anti-wind brigade is to do with offending their sensibilities rather than any real concern for the environment.

Log-in to Report

by steve cummings

24th January 2013, at 09:40:49

In my view if something is a good thing then it should be done, if it is a bad thing it should NOT be done. Is the photovoltaic park a good thing or a bad thing? If it is a good thing that it delivers electricity it to one house is that a good thing? if it is, then shouldn't an enlarged version be built to supply electricity to every household on the island? If that happened the area of photovoltaic panels needed for the 61,500 households would be 1,845 acres! NOW is it a good thing?

Log-in to Report

by Kevin Barclay-Jay

23rd January 2013, at 18:55:44

Mike..its you who spout nonsense and have done for at least the last 10 years. It is a wonderful world..shame you have to moan so much about it

Log-in to Report

by Kevin Barclay-Jay

23rd January 2013, at 17:37:31

sigh!!!! head in the sand anti green energy conspiracy nutters winging about subsidies waiting for the lights to go out, desperatly repeating the failed mantra of 'no such thing as global warning' (what that has to do with peak oil and the absolute neccesity of alternative energy production.
The only blight on this Island are people who cant see past their blinkers and see that we all must shere the responsibilty for energy production ..even here on the Island ... and hope and pray that science can come up with new scemes for energy production or perfect the ones we have...and until then we must look at solar farms and turbines for 25 years...a small cost for the future of our children.

Log-in to Report

by Steve Smith

23rd January 2013, at 15:33:11

Yvonne, I must have missed it last winter, could you tell me when it snowed?

Log-in to Report

by Yvonne Carter

23rd January 2013, at 13:41:13

I'm not sure about global warming. Years ago it was extremely rare to get snow on the island. 1963 is etched in memories and island history books. The last three winters (at least) have had snow here so perhaps. the climate is changing but colder and wetter. Who knows?
I love the island and feel very sad that it is changing at a rapid pace and not always for the better. Years ago (efore M&S) the island and ndependent traders fought very hard against mainland shops and stores setting up here. Now look, huge grey boxes and big empy shops in Newport town centre. Progress is not always successful. Lets try and keep the island a beautiful place for all of us. .

Log-in to Report

by geoffrey clynch

23rd January 2013, at 12:32:50

well said Mr.Crowe, this,Turbines..etc are all just part of one of the biggest SCAMS in history, Global Warming, you are all being fleeced for "GREEN" taxes to just make money for the elite and futher your brainwashing and the destruction of our countryside

Log-in to Report

by Paul Rainford

23rd January 2013, at 11:05:22

You're spot on, David Shoulder. The current approach to renewable energy - which is clearly a good thing - is so piecemeal in the UK and so often smacks of short-term opportunism rather than long-term planet-saving. Like you say, the whole energy strategy needs to be planned properly, not left to private chancers fighting over spare scraps of land to make a quick buck while the subsidies are there.

Log-in to Report

by David Shoulder

23rd January 2013, at 10:43:09

http://www.bnrg.ie/

Log-in to Report

by Mike Crowe

23rd January 2013, at 09:44:38

I have been thinking. Yes I know that's a strange thing to do, but perhaps someone can explain something to me. Don't set the speakers too high so the explanation goes over my head, but this is what I see.

The question is .. "Why is everybody hell bent on ruining tourism?""

Wighlink winding up their Fishbourne to Porstmouth service and selling off two desirable plots of land.

Applications to put those dreadful windmills everywhere, both on land and in the sea within sight.

And now a (It has got to be Seven Point Five, not SEVENTY FIVE Acre) massive eyesore to blight what "was" this beautiful Island.

As I explained before, no it is not in my back yard.

Please please PLEASE, stop these massive ugly eyesores. You are spoiling the Island.

If you want these dreadful blots on the landscape, move to an inner city with all their factories and offices ............................. then come to the Island for your holidays and appreciate the UNSPOILT

Log-in to Report

by David Shoulder

23rd January 2013, at 08:30:24

Another example of a piecemeal energy policy. Small unattractive schemes that blight the landscape for little real benefit. The schemes are heavily subsidised by the tax payer and often the motivation is little more than a money making scheme for a developer who can't quite get permission to build houses on the land. The wind turbine is going to appeal. How many more opportunists are going to blight the landscape with their cottage schemes before we realise our green energy need will have to come from more economic large scale production sited in areas with much less environmental impact - of which offshore is favourite. We need a strong central government lead on this. (ps our major industry is tourism based on the Islands natural beauty!)

Log-in to Report

by G Day

23rd January 2013, at 08:29:10

Why would birds collide with them? Are they invisible?

Log-in to Report

by Tim Brayford

23rd January 2013, at 07:43:04

Would someone please clarify whether this is a bona fide self funding commercial project or is any electricity produced merely a by product of milking the taxpayer of a large amount of money like wind farms do?

Log-in to Report

by steve cummings

23rd January 2013, at 07:10:41

Ian Armstrong if you think solar energy uses no fuel you have a few things still to learn. Have a look at how much energy is used in the making of the panels and how long they last and, last but not least, how often and for how long they will be providing significant amounts of energy. 75 acres will be covered in them to provide electricity for 2,500 houses. So should the whole of the island be covered in them to provide electricity for ALL the houses?

Log-in to Report

by ian armstrong

23rd January 2013, at 01:09:40

Mr Justice- as usual you've managed to concoct your rant using the largest amount of reverse logic I've come across!! Nothing green here??!! Eh? Solar energy IS green because it uses no fuel. I'm also guessing that this proposed developement is right outside your front door?

I'm not finished yet! Graeme Egerton's got it spot on- if birds flying into things is such a massive world-changing environmental disaster of such epic proportions then we should also be banning windows, glass, cars, buses, lorries, buildings, people, trees, cows, horses and all other objects that could get in the way of a flying bird! In short this is a brilliant win for alternative energy production. Don't worry Mr Justice, there's still enough fuel for your giant gas guzzler to run on so you can drive in luxury spreading your pointless ramblings. Me? I don't own a car, I use a bicycle ;-)

Log-in to Report

by Mr Justice

22nd January 2013, at 22:27:40

What a terrible waste of the countryside. Totally unnecessary - these schemes are all about making money, there's nothing green here - just ugly panels wrecking the vista. A total waste of taxpayers hard-earned. Gesture politics at its worst.

Log-in to Report

by Graeme Egerton

22nd January 2013, at 22:15:29

I think it's great news. A real step in the right direction. Solar energy is not THE answer, it's ONE of the answers (sorry to do the capital letters thingy). I can't claim to be an expert and experts themselves will disagree I'm sure, but it seems to me that we should make the best of all available technologies. One thing: why do we assume birds will always fly into green energy installations and not houses, flats, et cetera ?

Log-in to Report

by Paul Mellon

22nd January 2013, at 19:17:47

will the birds bother to report any collisions they have and who do they contact lol

Log-in to Report

by Terry Dalley

22nd January 2013, at 19:02:27

At last common sense rears its head if this works it could lead to other power sources being tried ,we must get our heads out of the sand and try these measures or how will we progress ,
Gas & electricity were frowned upon when first introduced as a non starter .At least this is a positive move instead of just talk talk talk.

Log-in to Report

by Mike Crowe

22nd January 2013, at 18:47:22

"""removed after 25 years"" .........!!!

Panic folks.The sun goes out in 25 years time .....

Should have invested in tidal power .... that will go on for ever, twice every 24 hours

Log-in to Report

by David Charlton

22nd January 2013, at 18:40:05

Ooh 2500 homes wow....

Any views or opinions presented in the comments above are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the Isle of Wight County Press.

Most Read

  1. Job losses at Isle of Wight College

    Monday, May 20, 2013

  2. Thousands affected by power cut

    Monday, May 20, 2013

  3. Former GP joins NHS trust board

    Monday, May 20, 2013

  4. Literary festival lines up big names

    Monday, May 20, 2013

  5. Desalination plan for the Island

    Tuesday, May 21, 2013