Call to publish Isle of Wight Festival plan rejected

By Emily Pearce

Friday, August 10, 2012

 

THE Isle of Wight Festival's traffic management plan will not be released to the public, despite concerns about traffic chaos at this year's event.

A request to view the festival's Event Safety and Operational Plan (ESOP), submitted by the County Press under the Freedom of Information Act, has today (Friday) been refused by the Isle of Wight Council.

Following consultation with festival organiser Solo, the council has decided the information contained in the ESOP is exempt from the act because it is commercially sensitive, and to release it would constitute a breach of confidentiality.

A letter issued to the County Press said: "Confidential information may be disclosed where there is an overriding interest in doing so. We note you make reference to the public interest in having access to the information and we acknowledge there is public interest in disclosure.

"The council has considered the public interest test, having had regard to the wider public interest in preserving confidentiality and the impact the disclosure would have on third parties.

"We are of the opinion that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in providing the information."

Furthermore, information contained in the ESOP relating to emergency procedures could jeopardise the security of the event if it were made public, according to the council, and some personal information — including contact details of named individuals — was also exempt.

As reported extensively by the County Press, the opening days of this year's Isle of Wight Festival were blighted by traffic chaos, sparking calls for the traffic management plant to be published so people could examine the contingency plans in place for adverse weather.

Children were stuck on school buses for hours, residents were unable to attend hospital appointments and one family missed a funeral.

The queues built up to such an extent ferries could not dock and revellers stuck in muddy festival car parks were towed free by tractors.

Reporter: emilyp@iwcpmail.co.uk

Comments

Log-in or register to comment on this story. See our House Rules here.

By ticking "Remember me" you agree to a cookie being stored on your computer - no personal data is shared.

Forgotten your password?
Displaying the last 10 of 16 comments - Show All Comments

Log-in to Report

by Paul Clipstone

19th August 2012, at 15:59:46

I have done some research and have completed the official complaint form to the ICO regarding the response the IOW council have given for not releasing this information which is NOT commercially sensitive at all. As residents who had our lives and businesses ruined because of the incompetence of the council and SOLO with no compensation offer at all we have a legal rite for this information. More to follow I am quite sure.

Log-in to Report

by James McAdder

13th August 2012, at 09:57:35

Personal and security related information could easily be redacted, so that excuse is lame in the extreme, and how, or even why, would a traffic management plan contain commercially sensitive information.

This refusal to publish brings me to one conclusion, borne out by the disaster that ensued and Giddings bombastic arrogance over the matter. The "traffic management plan" either does not exist, or was glaringly inadequate, and they just relied on pure luck.

Log-in to Report

by sidney barton

11th August 2012, at 21:44:11

Come on you councillors.Have you really got a system to beat the chaos of this years chaotic catastrophe regarding the I.O.W festival travelling conditions.? If so why not make it public.? we might be able to help.

Log-in to Report

by Douglas Bailey

11th August 2012, at 14:43:06

Solo must have more than a commercial reason why they don't want us to know the plans and the council must have other reasons why they have backed Solo!!!! I wander what it is???? Seaclose going private???

Log-in to Report

by Philip Yates

11th August 2012, at 13:19:47

Just think if we had a real disaster here.............
You wont find any councillors as they will have run, just like the RATs that they are.

Log-in to Report

by tony white

11th August 2012, at 12:42:43

king pugh and his devoted coutiers have spoken, only they are deemed fit to know anything about this top secret document mere mortals must not challenge their authority, good heavens the peasants will want votes next!

Log-in to Report

by Richard Taylor

11th August 2012, at 10:58:23

Just think if we had a real disaster here.............

Log-in to Report

by kevin froment

11th August 2012, at 07:57:05

makes you wonder if they wasting time while they are putting one together

Log-in to Report

by Richard Taylor

11th August 2012, at 04:04:58

This is crazy. We are not talking about the nuclear threat or national security, this is a ESOP about a music festival. Come on IOWCC if you have got one (which I doubt) let's see it!

Log-in to Report

by Russell Palin

10th August 2012, at 23:25:48

Is there an appeal procedure, or is the councils word on this final?

Any views or opinions presented in the comments above are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the Isle of Wight County Press.

Facebook Icon Twitter Icon Delicious Icon

More News

1 - 2 - 3 - 4