MP's tax questions for Wightlink owners

By Richard Wright

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

 

ISLE of Wight MP Andrew Turner wants to know if Wightlink’s Australian parent company is in the same tax avoidance category as Amazon, Starbucks and Google, which were recently shamed by a parliamentary committee.

The finances of Wightlink and parent company Macquarie Bank came under scrutiny at a public meeting meeting last week, organised by unions and attended by Mr Turner.

It was told ferry company bosses were forced to take action to save money because the Australian bank had paid too much for Wightlink and was paying exorbitantly high loan costs through internal borrowing.

Chartered accountant Peter Bonnell, of Yarmouth, told the meeting: "The holding company just lost £40 million after internal borrowing on a loan of £273 million on which it is paying 17 per cent interest."

He questioned how Wightlink could justify to the Inland Revenue paying such high interest rates to another Macquarie company "presumably based somewhere in the Bahamas."

Mr Turner, who promised to do all he could to protect the Island’s lifeline service, revealed that secretary of state for business Vince Cable had refused a meeting with him on the issue.

After the meeting he called on Macquarie to come clean on its complex funding arrangements which he estimated would enable it to claim £8 million in tax refunds.

"I have followed up the points Mr Bonnell raised and looked into the issue further. Wightlink’s most recent accounts were filed in December and show a profit of £8.6 million.

"However, the company that owns them, MEIF Shipping made a loss of over £44 million because they are paying another Macquarie company interest at an unbelievable rate of 17 per cent which amounts to more than £40 million a year in interest.

"It is not clear from these accounts who is the ultimate beneficiary of the £40 million. It is entirely possible it is being paid to a foreign based company in order to minimise liability for tax.

"To be clear, I am not suggesting this is illegal; but it is certainly not clear which companies are involved in this financial chain or where they pay tax.

"Amazon, Starbucks, Google and other multi-national giants have been heavily criticised for such activities and I would like to know whether Macquarie Group are also involved in such complex tax avoidance strategies."

Reporter: richardw@iwcpmail.co.uk

Comments

Log-in or register to comment on this story.

By ticking "Remember me" you agree to a cookie being stored on your computer - no personal data is shared.

Forgotten your password?

Log-in to Report

by T Rollingsworth

10th January 2013, at 10:23:51

The only thing that could come out of this if they were is a price hike to the customer. Thanks Andrew Turner.

Also, John, could you please explain your hate for WL over red funnel? RF provide a much worse service (red-jet, cant vouch for car ferry) for more money! - They wanted nearly 80 quid more a month than WL for my ticket! Although WL are far from perfect, they are the lesser evil for myself IMO.

Sadly, if you boycotted the service, they wouldn't lose out, they make most their money off Season tickets and people that *have* to use that route to get to work/school/uni etc.

Log-in to Report

by John Atkins

9th January 2013, at 21:56:39

Re Wightlink, Just Vote with your feet, use hovertravel or Red Funnel to make a point. In fact why not have a day or week of action and black Wightlink,. Hit them in the pocket.

Log-in to Report

by Mr Justice

9th January 2013, at 18:39:55

This stinks worse than the Ventnor seaweed scandal. Turner and the Tories must get to the bottom of this - our economy depends on it, nothing is more important to Island life.

Log-in to Report

by Jake Gully

9th January 2013, at 16:15:32

Absolutely Andrew, though this needs to be followed up with your party and coalition partners to make sure all companys trading within the UK are playing by the same rules and paying fair rates of tax.

Currently it seems that big business can do what it likes to work around the system, while small businesses are being dissadvantaged by playing fairly and paying the correct amounts.

Any views or opinions presented in the comments above are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the Isle of Wight County Press.

Facebook Icon Twitter Icon Delicious Icon

More News

Most Read

  1. Tributes paid after cliff death

    Wednesday, May 22, 2013

  2. Dredger stuck on sandbank

    Tuesday, May 21, 2013

  3. Desalination plan for the Island

    Tuesday, May 21, 2013

  4. Awards for Isle of Wight beaches

    Wednesday, May 22, 2013

  5. Free school gets government go-ahead

    Wednesday, May 22, 2013