Dead end for road campaign?

By Ross Findon

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

 

Dead end for road campaign?

Chris Whitehouse (centre) and Cllr John Hobart present the petition to Isle of Wight Council cabinet member for highways Cllr Edward Giles.

UPDATED 14:35*

CAMPAIGNERS who called for a Newport street to be re-opened to two way traffic may have lost their battle with the Isle of Wight Council.

More than 3,000 people signed a petition calling for Chapel Street to be re-opened to traffic coming from New Street to St James’s Street, along with the introduction of one-way measures on bends to improve safety.

The campaign was backed by Isle of Wight Councillor for Carisbrooke Cllr John Hobart, as well as election hopeful Chris Whitehouse.

But in a report due to go before the economy and environment scrutiny committee on Wednesday, next week, the strategic director for economy and environment Stuart Love said he would not recommend a change to the current system.

He said in the report: "I could not recommend changing the traffic management arrangements here, which have been reviewed a number of times both by council officers and external consultants appointed to develop and review the Newport traffic model, all of whom have concluded that the current arrangements, although not ideal are the best that can be achieved with the existing highway infrastructure.

"There has been no material change in circumstance sufficient to justify revisiting the last decision in December 2010, which confirmed the prohibition of driving order here.

"A preferred officer solution to improve the cross town traffic movements would be to develop a link via the Morey’s site although that is dependent upon development being brought forward on that site by the land owner."

He recommended councillors note the campaigners concerns, but that no changes be made.

*Mr Whitehouse said: "The recommendation is not entirely unexpected, but we hope that, when the case is formally made to the scrutiny panel, the members will see the wisdom of what has been proposed on behalf of residents and we still hope that will result in support in principle to the removal of the no entry sign."

Reporter: ross.findon@iwcp.co.uk

Comments

Log-in or register to comment on this story.

By ticking "Remember me" you agree to a cookie being stored on your computer - no personal data is shared.

Forgotten your password?

Log-in to Report

by Richard White

30th January 2013, at 17:34:50

...because Elm Grove has had a gate across it for years?

Log-in to Report

by Jake Wallace

30th January 2013, at 14:35:48

@peter - a boost to the nodehil commerce .. because you can always find parking down there

@ atkinson - if getting to the nodehill side is so important why not take nelson road & elm grove & come staright down st johns .. nodehill in an instant

Log-in to Report

by Mr Justice

30th January 2013, at 13:23:04

The same Highways experts who only grit a handful of Island roads?

As for Mr love being ousted - I think you'll find new administration's have a record of removing officers they don't see eye to eye with or they feel see things differently? These pay-offs have cost us millions in the past decade. After May 3rd we'll have the taxpayers cheque book out again.

Log-in to Report

by V Atkinson

30th January 2013, at 12:53:12

I'd love to know if any of the people making the decisions on this actually live in the area?? I live one street away and the current one way is a nightmare for anyone wishing to get to nodehill side of Newport. To get to Nodehill it takes 5-10 mins to drive, should take 30 seconds...great for fuel economy and the enviroment, when if they just turned the one way end of Chapel street the other way (one way still) it would solve all the problems!!!! Try talking to the residents who pay their taxes and are the people being effected.

Log-in to Report

by Peter Islander

30th January 2013, at 12:01:09

It would bring a boost to commerce in Nodehill. It would relieve Whitepit lane and St. John's Road of vehicles wishing to get to the supermarket areas. It would save fossil fuel. It would give choice back to people. A straight decision of 3000 taxpayers against a handful of "experts". Who ever allowed the buses to park outside the Seely library,thereby blocking the view of pedestrians and vehicles at the nearby crossing?..... Oh, yes,the "experts"!

Log-in to Report

by Jake Wallace

30th January 2013, at 10:56:04

Does anyone know of any benefits of it being opened to 2-way traffic again

Only one i can think of is to make a quick rat-run from the Carisbrooke area to St Georges Way -- other than that no real reason at all.

Log-in to Report

by Chris Firth

30th January 2013, at 06:00:19

Civil disobedience? Take the signs down and make it 2 way by popular demand (with H&S warnings of course

Log-in to Report

by Den Young

29th January 2013, at 23:18:46

sorry guys but did you really think council would listen to you or take any notice of any poll that was taken, they cant be proved wrong even when they are, never mind soon be May and then we can voteanother shower in who will do just the same.

Log-in to Report

by Chris Firth

29th January 2013, at 21:53:46

Civil disobedience? Take the signs down and make it 2 way by popular demand (with H&S warnings of course

Log-in to Report

by Colin Russell

29th January 2013, at 21:15:37

Thats right pam but he is still able to be sacked, no Council or Council worker is bigger than the electorate as will be shown on May 3rd

Log-in to Report

by Pam Riddet

29th January 2013, at 18:26:24

Stuart Love is a paid employee - you can't vote him out!

Log-in to Report

by Corrie Rayner

29th January 2013, at 17:55:48

Sorry, allegedly I had 7 letters left!
Here's the rest:
I conclude that the current situation is definitely not "the best that can be achieved with the existing highway infrastructure" - sorry, Mr Love.

Log-in to Report

by Corrie Rayner

29th January 2013, at 17:52:59

The "council officers and external consultants appointed to develop and review the Newport traffic model" must be the same "experts" that kept the widest road in Newport, Church Litten, a one-way street - the cause of many traffic jams elsewhere. Of course it makes a good substitute Bus Station for SVectis.
Also, when it suits, changes to traffic movement are surreptitiously introduced without consultation. One example is the new set of traffic lights at Drill Hall Road, originally set up by Siemens, where someone dramatically altered the sequence for pedestrians crossing. Currently, when the pedestrian lights change to red there are only 3 seconds left until the traffic lights change to red/amber. You better run!
Also, my experience with Coppins Bridge is that it is best navigated during power failures and no traffic lights working.
I conclude that the current situation is definitely not "the best that can be achieved with the existing highway infrastructur

Log-in to Report

by Mike Crowe

29th January 2013, at 16:49:59

There must be a 'sting in the tail' letter here somewhere. The sort that the Council would have no option but to agree with. Such as the ones I have already posted viz Gas Board Main and the Flooding if South Wight Borough Council, (yes all those years ago nit picker) granted planning permission on surplus land at the cemetary.

Log-in to Report

by Gary Ball

29th January 2013, at 15:30:51

Please IW Tories I appeal to you not to vote for your preferred/normal national party in the upcoming local elections, by all means do so in a the general election in a few years time but the present Council are doing the Island no favours no matter what your political allegiancies are, their time really has to be up.

Log-in to Report

by Geoff Lumley

29th January 2013, at 15:16:25

I bet the majority-group controlled scrutiny panel recommends re-opening the street to two-way traffic. There is an election in 3 months time and the two lead 'campaigners' are both majority-group members/aspirants.

Log-in to Report

by Tom Spragg

29th January 2013, at 15:14:45

Good luck in voting Stuart Love out. He's there until his pension kicks in

Log-in to Report

by Mr Justice

29th January 2013, at 15:13:25

Oh dear, I fear the first of many battles between the officers and Mr Wighthouse. If he gets elected. I reckon Mr Love has made a mistake here.

But not as big a mistake as Mr Pugh - in not stopping him becoming a candidate for the Tories. He's bound to take over isn't he?

Log-in to Report

by tony white

29th January 2013, at 15:05:29

3000 sign a petition and this farce of a council arrogantly push it aside, come may it would be hoped the 3000 will show with their votes exactly what they think of this lot

Log-in to Report

by Colin Russell

29th January 2013, at 14:52:37

Gary, But they will listern on May 3rd , it will be our turn tell them in terms they will not like, but then lifes ****.

Log-in to Report

by geoffrey clynch

29th January 2013, at 14:23:49

how much more evidence does the Island residents need to prove that this council is ignoring your wishes, 3,000 more told to shut up and do as your told, by the lib/lab/con/eu pact, time to kick all of these government men out in May

Log-in to Report

by Tim Brayford

29th January 2013, at 14:12:52

Does public sector arrogance know no limits, might I suggest a referendum on this issue?

Log-in to Report

by Gary Ball

29th January 2013, at 13:59:34

Great to see yet another example of the Council not listening to the public.

Any views or opinions presented in the comments above are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the Isle of Wight County Press.

Facebook Icon Twitter Icon Delicious Icon

More News

1 - 2 - 3 - 4

Most Read

  1. Ferry involved in yacht collision

    Friday, May 24, 2013

  2. Plan to end contractor deal for top officer

    Friday, May 24, 2013

  3. Dragon disappears from garden

    Friday, May 24, 2013

  4. UB40 gig called off

    Friday, May 24, 2013

  5. UB40 gig rescheduled

    Friday, May 24, 2013